Thank you for visiting Dick's Sporting Goods. If you need assistance with shopping on our site, please call us at 1-877-846-9997 and a customer care representative will be happy to assist you. Please inform the Customer Service representative that you require assistance.

Brine Men's King Superlight Lacrosse Gloves - Dick's Sporting Goods

Brine Men's King Superlight Lacrosse Gloves

Item Number: 10886927
Price: $99.99
Free Shipping Eligible on Qualifying Purchases Over $49! Up to $15 Shipping Credit. (See Promotion Details)



2SIZE: 


3QTY:

SHIPPING INFO: Usually ships in 1 - 2 business days.
Standard Ground Service Available (normally $7.19)
Note: Shipping restrictions may apply.

Product Availability & Price

Product Information

Customer Reviews

Buying Guide


Protect your hands without sacrificing comfort or flexibility with the lightest glove in the game. Brine ® Men's King Superlight Lacrosse Gloves, at just 6 ounces, are light, durable and incredibly comfortable. Dual density foam keeps you safe from the dangers of the game while back hand, palm and finger ventilation points wick away moisture to keep you dry and comfortable.

FEATURES:

  • Superb back hand venting and dual density foam makes this glove a fortress for your hands
  • Dual material build of high-end leather and high-end grade nylon knit
  • New palm design allows for ultimate air flow
  • Breathable mesh palm inserts and finger gussets
  • Ventilator moisture-management performance liner
  • Great mobility and flexibility with an adjustable floating cuff
  • Weighing in at 6 oz, is the lightest weight in the Brine® family
  • Model: LGLKSL13BK
  • Brine


Country of Origin: Philippines

Customer Reviews

Rated 4.8 out of 5 by 12 reviewers.
Rated 5 out of 5 by light,durable i really like these gloves they are well padded all around and very light January 29, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by great gloves, durable, comfortable A great product overall June 2, 2012
Rated 4 out of 5 by Awesome great and light April 23, 2012
Rated 5 out of 5 by Not all gloves r equal, especially these About a month ago, i bought the King superlights in black but they felt bad and didn't fit my fingers, then i returned them and finally found ones that fit, the superlights in size 12 (white) for $80 and so far they are a great glove that is protective with the stationary cuff and cool looking all around. [@] has rightfully nammed it the number one glove for 3 weeks straight over the Mac daddy 3. February 29, 2012
Rated 5 out of 5 by Awesome lax gloves I just picked these up a few days ago in 12'' and so far i am very, very pleased by the quality, style and comfort of these gloves. When i took them to my first practice all my friends thought they were really comfortable and flexible. The gloves are also very lightweight and breathable. Overall, these are a great glove for the intermediate to advanced player. October 28, 2011
Rated 5 out of 5 by Best gloves on the market. Period. I needed to step up my gloves from the cheap yet legit STX Rivals. I bought these gloves for the name, Superlight. These are honestly super light. They are about 5 ounces. They make cradling easy, you can move your hands, and throw and catch without a problem. I would recommend these gloves to any amateur lacrosse players, or beginners advancing to the next level. May 7, 2011
Rated 5 out of 5 by most comfortable gloves the protection is not that good, as long as you dont mind a little pain when you get hit in the hands these gloves are awesome. April 12, 2011
Rated 5 out of 5 by Niiiice They feel like sweet georgia pine on a sunday morrrning April 8, 2011
Rated 5 out of 5 by light wait good protection i use this for attack/defence and i get hit in the hand all the time and im writing this on 4/3/11 and the season started last month and i havent got hurt and i would recomend these to anybody who want light weight and comfurtability and i wish i got the orange ones April 2, 2011
Rated 5 out of 5 by LOVING THESE GLOVES If u want gloves that look sick and also feel like theyre not there get these. protection is not bad either. March 13, 2011
2 next>>