Rated 2 out of 5 by John Needs more sting-resistant padding
My son likes the batting gloves, but compared to the Mizuno batting gloves the Under Armour does not seem to have a lot of padding to decrease the stinging when hitting. He definitely prefers the Mizuno brand.
February 11, 2014
Rated 5 out of 5 by sls under armour has great products
Under Amour is the best! We always choose under armour products. They have the best durability.
September 17, 2013
Rated 4 out of 5 by Dill always buy underarmer products. top quality
Very happy with purchase. Surely continue shopping for this brand.
August 29, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by Fastpitch Perfect
My daughter got these because she tore through her old pair. She plays 14U spring/summer and highschool during the fall. She LOVES these gloves. She even wears one when she's fielding(inside her glove. She plays 1st)....
August 22, 2013
Rated 1 out of 5 by Baseball Poor quality
these batting gloves ripped the 2nd time they were used.
August 22, 2013
Rated 2 out of 5 by First Baseman Poorly constructed product
I play in an over 45 wood bat baseball league and needed a good pair of batting gloves. I had purchased a much cheaper Under Armor pair earlier in the season but the stitching gave way after several games. I figured I would give a more expensive pair of Under Armor batting gloves a chance because the leather palm seemed well designed. However, I was again quickly disappointed in the quality of these batting gloves stitching too. After three games the material began to separate like the much cheaper gloves. If you can get over the hype of Under Armor and want a pair of gloves that will last a season...go out and buy a pair of thin mechanics gloves. Once you smack your first hit...your teammates and opposing catcher will stop trash talking. Hit a home run and they will be lining up at the Hardware Store to buy a pair too. And guess what...they are cheaper!!!
August 6, 2013
Rated 3 out of 5 by Kailund Under Par..
These gloves were great when I first got them. No real break in period, they fit perfect and gripped the bat wonderfully. But that didn't last long. They tore on the top of my right glove at the stitching between the two different fabrics. I use them only for batting, I have separate one for my mitt. They were used 2 days out of the week for 4 weeks before they tore. I still use them, for now, but I am kinda disappointed in there construction. Under Armor has done much better products in the past. I have used there products over everyone else because of how great they have been but I think they dropped the ball on these ones. Could have been just my pair but I think I will look for another set. Still going with Under Armor but not these particular gloves.
July 24, 2013
Rated 2 out of 5 by BY Bad grip
These batting gloves were good for the first few weeks and then they started to lose grip. I had zero grip left in them with a few weeks left in the season. I started not to use them because i had better grip with my bare hands. I do not recommend these if you are looking to use them for a long time
July 9, 2013
Rated 1 out of 5 by Kimatt930 Very poor quality
I would never buy these again. They ripped within 5 days of my son using them in batting practice. Don't buy them, it's a waste of money.
June 18, 2013
Rated 3 out of 5 by Joe Fragile
Gloves are lightweight and are comfortable. Offers a good grip of the bat. My pair has already ripped after only 2 games. Came apart at the seem on top of the knuckles. Would be a great buy if this did not happen. For $45, I expect these to last a lot longer, obviously
June 18, 2013