Rated 5 out of 5 by T357 Paper Target
Great inexpensive product to improve - test - and, well, just have fun shooting.
Also good for greater distance rimfire rifle.
October 2, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by tarheelgunner Sharp, clear printing and reasonable price
I bought these as an aid for teaching rifle marksmanship to my grandkids. Although these are designated as pistol targets, they work well with rimfire rifles. The scoring rings provide a means of measuring accuracy improvement, and the orange center shows up well through aperture sights.
September 25, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by pack 50 yard pistol targets
I used these for my 8 year old grandson's Cricket youth single shot rifle. They worked GREAT.
September 5, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by mem1911 On Target
Excellent product for target shooting; good print and color contrast.
August 2, 2013
Rated 4 out of 5 by smkranz good bright targets
Target gives a bright view of the bullseye. Easily visible holes. Does what you want from a paper target.
June 4, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by Chalmers Dicks Quality Products
Needed some inexpensive but nice targets to teach my grandson pellet rifle safety and accuracy. This product was perfect for our needs. They allowed me to keep his interest while teaching him how to safely handle and shoot the Bone Collector pellet rifle I had purchased several months earlier.
May 28, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by cliffypop Excellent
Bullseye! These targets are easy to see from a distance.
May 20, 2013
Rated 4 out of 5 by Ren Target Paper
Adequate for its purpose. Should contain more sheets in the package.
March 5, 2013
Rated 4 out of 5 by Jim I use this product all the time
I use these targets for pistol target practice and I have found that they are the perfect size target for me when I check zero on my rifle scopes. It is easy to see my shots and the target circles are about the size of the "sweet spot " on a White Tail deer.
October 17, 2012
Rated 3 out of 5 by SAV Overpriced for just paper.
It served the purpose, but was overpriced, and on flimsy paper. Twice the number would have been more reasonable.
August 6, 2012