Thank you for visiting Dick's Sporting Goods. If you need assistance with shopping on our site, please call us at 1-877-846-9997 and a customer care representative will be happy to assist you. Please inform the Customer Service representative that you require assistance.

Nike Men's Home Game Jersey New York Jets Eric Decker #87

$100.00
Nike Men's Home Game Jersey New York Jets Eric Decker #87 - Dick's Sporting Goods
  • Show Enhanced
  • Free Shipping Plus Free Returns on Apparel!
  • New York Jets
Size Chart
  • S
  • M
  • L
  • XL
  • XXL
Check Store Availability

Usually ships in 1 - 2 business days.

Standard Ground Service Available (normally $7.19)

Product Information:

Bring sure hands and reliability to your Sunday tailgate with the Nike® New York Jets Eric Decker #87 Home Game Jersey. Represent your favorite Jets wideout in true Gang Green fashion by sporting Decker's name and number screen-printed on lightweight, polyester fabric. The jersey's ventilated-mesh side panels, strategically placed at the sides, promote breathability while the durable, tagless collar ensures all-day comfort.
FEATURES:

  • Jets Eric Decker #87 lightweight, athletic-fit game jersey
  • Decker's #87 screen-printed on the front
  • Player name and number screen-printed on the back
  • Screen-printed Jets team graphics included in the jersey's design
  • Swoosh™ design trademark screen-printed on the sleeves
  • TPU NFL Shield logo positioned on the V-neck collar
  • Strategically placed mesh-ventilation side panels enhance breathability
  • Satin twill, woven jock tag at the lower left hem
  • Tagless neck label for added comfort
  • Machine washable, cold
  • Officially licensed by the NFL
  • Fabric: 100% polyester
  • Nike
Country of Origin: Vietnam
Web ID: 35356366

Customer Reviews:

Rated 4 out of 5 by 1 reviewer.
Rated 4 out of 5 by neck neck tight I bought xl and the neck is tight-----rest of jersey fits well---after wearing it a few times the neck is all wrinkled-----an xxl would fix the problem but the rest of jersey would be to large June 11, 2014
1-1 of 1