Thank you for visiting Dick's Sporting Goods. If you need assistance with shopping on our site, please call us at 1-877-846-9997 and a customer care representative will be happy to assist you. Please inform the Customer Service representative that you require assistance.

Under Armour Women's ColdGear Cozy Shimmer Leggings

$51.99 $69.99*
Save $18.00 (26%)
Under Armour Women's ColdGear Cozy Shimmer Leggings - Dick's Sporting Goods
  • Show Enhanced
  • Free Shipping Plus Free Returns on Apparel!
  • Granite/ivory
  • Granite/lavendar Ice
Size Chart
  • XS
  • S
  • M
  • L
  • XL
Check Store Availability
Guaranteed to Get There

Usually ships in 1 - 2 business days.

Standard Ground Service Available (normally $6.99)

Product Information:

Stay on your fitness routine when the temperature drops with the Under Armour® Women's ColdGear® Cozy Shimmer Leggings. Style and performance come together with a heat-trapping interior for warmth, and ice shimmer leg panels for a standout look. These bottoms wick moisture away to keep you dry, while four-way stretch keeps you moving in total comfort. With a flat yoga-inspired waistband, the UA Shimmer Leggings reinvent your workouts.

  • Fitted leggings
  • Dual-layer EVO ColdGear® construction offers a smooth, quick-dry outer layer with a brushed, heat-trapping inner layer
  • Signature Moisture Transport System wicks sweat away to keep you dry and light
  • 4-Way Stretch construction enhances mobility and maintains its shape
  • Flat, yoga-inspired waistband sits comfortably on your hips
  • Allover mélange texture for a soft feel and modern style
  • Ice shimmer effect on waistband and leg panels
  • Fabric: polyester / elastane
  • Style: 1248547
  • Under Armour
Country of Origin: Nicaragua
Web ID: 52103626

Customer Reviews:

Under Armour Women's ColdGear Cozy Shimmer Leggings 3 5 1 1
not for me Material was thin which is good for summer or someone who preferred a skin fit, but I didnt like it because it was Too see through when bending over. The colors were nic, but. I wouldn't pay 75$ for this. November 26, 2014
1-1 of 1